Exploring 6 years of colorectal cancer surgery in rural Italy: insights from 648 consecutive patients unveiling successes and challenges.

The multidisciplinary management of patients suffering from colorectal cancer (CRC) has significantly increased survival over the decades and surgery remains the only potentially curative option for it. However, despite the implementation of minimally invasive surgery and ERAS pathway, the overall morbidity and mortality remain quite high, especially in rural populations because of urban - rural disparities. The aim of the study is to analyze the characteristics and the surgical outcomes of a series of unselected CRC patients residing in two similar rural areas in Italy. A total of 648 consecutive patients of a median age of 73 years (IQR 64-81) was enrolled between 2017 and 2022 in a prospective database. Emergency admission (EA) was recorded in 221 patients (34.1%), and emergency surgery (ES) was required in 11.4% of the patients. Tumor resection and laparoscopic resection rates were 95.0% and 63.2%, respectively. The median length of stay was 8 days. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 23.5% and 3.2%, respectively. EA was associated with increased median age (77.5 vs. 71 ys, p < 0.001), increased mean ASA Score (2.84 vs. 2.59; p = 0.002) and increased IV stage disease rate (25.3% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.001). EA was also associated with lower tumor resection rate (87.3% vs. 99.1%, p < 0.001), restorative resection rate (71.5 vs. 89.7%, p < 0.001), and laparoscopic resection rate (36.2 vs. 72.6%, p < 0.001). Increased mortality rates were associated with EA (7.2% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001), ES (11.1% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001) and age more than 80 years (5.8% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001). In rural areas, high quality oncologic care can be delivered in CRC patients. However, the surgical outcomes are adversely affected by a still too high proportion of emergency presentation of elderly and frail patients that need additional intensive care supports beyond the surgical skill and alternative strategies for earlier detection of the disease.

Advantages of the Maneuver of Intestinal Derotation for Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the surgical treatment of choice for cephalopancreatic cancer representing the only hope of cure. Since its first description in 1935 by Allan Whipple, several modifications have been proposed. The execution of the Cattell-Braasch maneuver of intestinal derotation (ID) in the course of PD, by restoring the entire bowel to its embryological position, could represent a further and multiexpedient variant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 45 consecutive pancreatic cancer patients treated with Whipple-Child PD in which the Cattell-Braasch procedure of ID was performed as integrative part of the intervention. Additionally, we compared our results with the ones of conventional PD performed through open, laparoscopy, and robotic surgery. Continuous variables of ID-PD were calculated using Student's t-test whereas Mantel-Haenszel method was used for comparison with other non-ID PD techniques. RESULTS: The average operative time was 342 min (range 250-435 min). The median estimated intraoperative blood loss was 460 ml (range 350-570 ml) (p < .0001); no intraoperative blood transfusion was required. The average number of lymph nodes harvested per specimen was 19.4 (range 17-25) (p < .0001). Morbidity and mortality rate was 28.8% and 4.4% (respectively p < .0001 and p = .1596). CONCLUSION: Our data are in keeping with the classical PDs performed without ID. The association of the maneuver of ID with PD seems to bring some important advantages such as wider exposure of the operative field, safer dissection of anatomical structures, less intraoperative blood loss and higher number of sampled lymph nodes.

PPH-01 versus PPH-03 to perform STARR for the treatment of hemorrhoids associated with large internal rectal prolapse: a prospective multicenter randomized trial.

PURPOSE: This multicenter randomized study was designed to compare the clinical and functional results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) performed with 2 staplers (PPH-01 vs. PPH-03) in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease associated with a large internal rectal prolapse. METHODS: From a total of 937 patients, referred for hemorrhoidal disease in the 20 centers involved in the study, 425 (45.3%) with prolapsed hemorrhoids associated with a large internal rectal prolapse were randomized to undergo STARR with PPH-01 or PPH-03. Postoperative evaluation was made at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The incidence of bleeding at the stapled line was significantly lower in the PPH-03 group than in the PPH-01 group (58/207 [28.0%] vs. 145/201 [72.1%]; P < .0001); the mean number of hemostatic stitches was significantly higher in the PPH-01 than in the PPH-03 group (3.2 ± 0.1 vs. 1.8 ± 0.8; P < .0001). The mean operative time was 25.1 ± 11.5 minutes in the PPH-03 group and 38.1 ± 15.7 minutes in the PPH-01 group (P < .0001). No major complications occurred in either of the groups. At 12-month follow-up, the success rate in the 2 groups was 94.5% in the PPH01 group and 94.2% in the PPH03 group. CONCLUSION: STARR performed for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease associated with a large rectal prolapse is a safe and effective procedure. The use of the PPH-03 stapler instead of the PPH-01 guarantees a statistically significant reduction of intraoperative bleeding and a significant decrease of the operative time.

Selected treatments for duodenal perforation after ERCP. A report of three cases.

Perforation is one of the most serious complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. In the last decade, the management has shifted towards a more selective approach. Three cases are reported here involving three different treatments. In one case, the patient was submitted to a surgical procedure, while a conservative strategy was preferred in the other two, consisting in a naso-biliary drain and endoscopic clip placement, respectively. In this way, the safety of surgical and nonsurgical management of ERCP-related duodenal perforations was tested.

[Laparoscopic appendectomy: retrospective studies of 172 consecutive procedures]. / Appendicectomia laparoscopica: analisi retrospettiva su 172 procedure consecutive.

The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic appendectomy, as performed by experienced and trainee surgeons in a Unit of General Surgery. From June 1997 to May 2002, 172 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Age below 13 years was an exclusion criterion. There was no single protocol for the diagnosis and surgical technique adopted by the different surgeons. The average operating time was 65.3 min (range: 41-106 min). There were 9 conversions to open surgery (5.2%) and 9 postoperative complications (5.5%) out of a total of 162 patients undergoing the laparoscopic procedure. Oral intake was resumed on post-operative day 2 and the average hospital stay was 3.4 days (range: 3-5 days). In conclusion, laparoscopic appendectomy proved to be safe and effective, even when performed by surgeons with only limited experience of minimally invasive surgery.